Added
10/13/07
Answer to Order to Show Cause and motion to Vacate and Dismiss said Order
Download the
BANNED
For FREE!
Irwin Schiff's 2004
"ZERO" Tax Return
New:
Irwin Schiff
Interviews
Irwin Schiff Railroaded by IRS by JIM DAVIES of SimplySchiff e-groups Click Here
Criminal Character of Judge Dawson Exposed plus Exhibit
Shocking
Trial Blogs
Link 1
Link 2
Irwin's Letter to
Lou Dobbs
The government opposed on
May 24
Schiff replied on
May 27, 2005.
This motion and the reply, expose the entire
fraudulent character of the federal income tax and it's
criminal enforcement by the federal government.
Feature Article:
Las Vegas Tribune April 1, 2005
|
Irwin Schiff
|
Irwin's Counselor, Shelly Waxman has 5 books available at
Amazon
Click Here
|
Lien & Levy Packet New Informational Packets Available for ordering Online Now! We have been getting calls from people who have had specific problems in three areas involving income taxes
For the last year or so I have avoided selling my informational packets which were designed to enable you to protect yourself (to some degree) from the government’s criminal enforcement of the income tax. To prevent me from doing so, the government got a federal judge to enjoin me from selling The Federal Mafia; however, the injunction went vaguely and lawlessly beyond that. If you will read that Injunction Order (especially pages 33 and 34) seen here you'll see what I mean. Since the alleged purpose of the Injunction was to prevent me from providing information that might cause you to stop paying income taxes altogether, I believed the bulk of my informational packets – which do not focus on this particular issue - fell outside the scope of that Injunction. However, I did not want to risk being arbitrarily held to have violated the terms of my injunction (and sent to jail), since I know how federal judges punish people even when they have done no wrong - as the imposition of the Injunction itself proves. In any case, the three situations described above have nothing to do with not paying income taxes. As a matter of fact, people have contacted me who have actually been paying income taxes (and who have none of my material), but who simply did not know how to deal with these situations – and the problems caused by them - when confronted by them. Suffice it to say that the IRS violates every law in the Internal Revenue Code that are related to each of these three issues (which you should have already figured out just from the information now posted free of charge on my web cite) but unless you can cite chapter and verse (and effectively convey this information to third parties), you will probably end up being another victim to IRS predators. Instead of having convenient packets and tapes of information available to help people in these situations, I have had to arrange time consuming consultations which have, nevertheless, allowed me to include extensive disclaimers. All of the information now posted on my website (which was not there when the Injunction Order was issued) - has allowed me to warn and ask people with whom I have consulted “Do you understand that the government claims that everything I might tell you about the income tax is not true and might even constitute tax evasion? Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? Have you read all those government pleadings now posted on my web site that claim everything I say about income taxes is wrong? Do you understand I am now being criminally prosecuted because of my views on income taxes? Well before you adopt any of my suggestions regarding income taxes, I advise you to read those government pleadings...” Based on such a warning and disclaimer (now included in all my packets) how could I mislead anyone regarding my views on income taxes and whether or not they are legally legitimate? Practically everything I might tell people about income taxes has already been extensively “refuted” by the government (in many cases by two sets of government tax lawyers and a Magistrate Judge to boot) all of which are now posted on my own web site!Of course, I have also posted my views as to why I think those government positions are all wet; however, the you certainly have the right to decide whose positions you believe, and decide for yourself who is telling the truth! Since my trial date is now drawing ominously near, I have no time to devote to consultations, so - because of what I have stated above - I have decided to make this information available in packet form, but you'll have to find it from sources other than this website since the store is closed. You should have already discovered from all of the information now posted on my website that IRS agents have absolutely no legal authority to do anything in connection with income taxes – much less lien and seize property in connection with that tax. So based on all that free information, you shouldn’t even need to buy this Packet. However, the Packet (and its one hour tape) contains methods, letters, and procedures for dealing with third parties (such as employers, banks, and brokerage firms) who the IRS is trying to intimidate into turning over your money based on a benign “notice of levy” that third parties can immediately throw (with impunity) into the nearest trash can. However, most third parties don’t know this, and., in many cases, (since they have generally honored them in the past) - they don’t want to know it. The Packet contains numerous documents and information that should stop all IRS liens and levees which, remember, are illegal to begin with. One document alone should stop all IRS attempts to seize your wages dead in its tracks. But that does not mean it will - for reasons I just described. It all depends on how effectively and forcefully you use the material, though it is not at all complicated. However, some third parties are so fearful of the IRS (which is what the IRS counts on in extorting your money from third parties) that they would literally put a gun to your head and get your money that way, if told to do so by the IRS. However, the material should work and the packet should pay for itself just in the time it saves you in assembling the material – overlooking the money it will save you if it works, as it should. |
|
